Differential expression and responsiveness of chemokine receptors (CXCR1–3) by human microvascular endothelial cells and umbilical vein endothelial cells

R Salcedo, JH Resau, D Halverson… - The FASEB …, 2000 - Wiley Online Library
R Salcedo, JH Resau, D Halverson, EA Hudson, M Dambach, D Powell, KEN Wasserman…
The FASEB Journal, 2000Wiley Online Library
The basis for the angiogenic effects of CXC chemokines such as interleukin 8 (IL‐8) and for
angiostatic chemokines such as interferon‐inducible protein 10 (IP‐10) has been difficult to
assess. We recently reported, based on an RNase protection assay, that human umbilical
vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) did not express detectable mRNA for the IL‐8 receptors
CXCR1 and CXCR2. This raised the possibility of heterogeneity of receptor expression by
different endothelial cell (ECs) types. Since systemic angiogenesis induced by IL‐8 would …
Abstract
The basis for the angiogenic effects of CXC chemokines such as interleukin 8 (IL‐8) and for angiostatic chemokines such as interferon‐inducible protein 10 (IP‐10) has been difficult to assess. We recently reported, based on an RNase protection assay, that human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) did not express detectable mRNA for the IL‐8 receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2. This raised the possibility of heterogeneity of receptor expression by different endothelial cell (ECs) types. Since systemic angiogenesis induced by IL‐8 would more likely involve microvessel ECs, we investigated CXC receptor expression on human microvascular dermal endothelial cells (HMECs). By confocal microscopy and immunofluorescence we observed that HMECs consistently expressed high levels of CXCR1 and CXCR4 (mean fluorescence intensity of 261 ±22.1 and 306.2±19, respectively) and intermediate levels of CXCR3 and CXCR2 (173.9±30.2 and 156±30.9, respectively). In contrast, only a small proportion of HUVEC preparations expressed low levels of CXCR1, ‐2, and ‐3 (66±19.9; 49±15, and 81.4±17.9, respectively). However, both HMECs and HUVECs expressed equal levels of CXCR4. As expected, HMECs had more potent chemotactic responses to IL‐8 than HUVECs, and this was correlated with the levels of IL‐8 receptors on the ECs. Antibodies to CXCR1 and CXCR2 each had inhibitory effects on chemotaxis of HMECs to IL‐8, indicating that both IL‐8 receptors contributed to the migratory response of these cells toward IL‐8. Assessment of the functional capacity of CXCR3 unexpectedly revealed that HMECs migrated in response to relatively higher concentrations (100–500 ng/ml) of each of the ‘angiostatic’ chemokines IP‐10, ITAC, and MIG. Despite this, the ‘angiostatic’ chemokines inhibited the chemotactic response of HMECs to IL‐8. IL‐8 and SDF‐1α but not IP‐10 induced calcium mobilization in adherent ECs, suggesting that signaling events associated with calcium mobilization are separable from those required for chemotaxis. Taken together, our data indicated that functional differences among EC types is dependent on the level of the expression of CXC chemokine receptors. Whether this heterogeneityin receptor expression by ECs reflects distinct differentiation pathways remains to be established.—Salcedo, R., Resau, J. H., Halverson, D., Hudson, E. A., Dambach, M., Powell, D., Wasserman, K., Oppenheim, J. J. Differential expression and responsiveness of chemokine receptors (CXCR1–3) by human microvascular endothelial cells and umbilical vein endothelial cells. FASEB J. 14, 2055–2064 (2000)
Wiley Online Library